Antihypertensives: Which Treatment Option Is Most Effective?
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may not be the best choice for treatment of hypertension, according to a recent study.
Although current guidelines recommend the use of any thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers for hypertension monotherapy, it is still unclear which of these treatment options is optimal.
The researchers developed a comprehensive framework to compare effectiveness and safety of antihypertensive drugs and outcomes from observational data from 4.9 million patients. Using the framework, they conducted a systematic, large-scale study comparing relative risk for 3 primary and 6 secondary effectiveness outcomes and 46 safety outcomes among first-line classes.
While the majority of estimates revealed no apparent effectiveness differences between drug classes, thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics demonstrated better primary effectiveness than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics were also favored in safety profiles over ACE inhibitors. Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers were shown to be significantly inferior to the other classes.
“This comprehensive framework introduces a new way of doing observational health-care science at scale. The approach supports equivalence between drug classes for initiating monotherapy for hypertension—in keeping with current guidelines, with the exception of thiazide or thiazide-like diuretics superiority to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and the inferiority of non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers,” the authors concluded.
—Michael Potts
Reference:
Suchard MA, Scheumie MJ, Krumholz HM, et al. Comprehensive comparative effectiveness and safety of first-line antihypertensive drug classes: a systematic, multinational, large-scale analysis [published online October 24, 2019]. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32317-7.